Well we now know from the prior post the drop is NOT from the shorts. Nice to have that behind. You have that angle fixed for you.
Insider trading ?
I think not.
Did what BCSC thought they were seeing look like insider trading ? Yes
Why?
I think someone who is not with the company, now, thus not an insider under the law, got a bunch of shares.
Millions of shares which multiplied 3 fold when the strange stock 3 for 1 split was done in early December.
And I think that person paid for the pumps.
Knew where to get the money to finance the pumps.
$1.5 million
I think that person knew how to write these phony PRs.
Knew what language would work.
And that person made millions selling into the run ups.
He got YOUR profit.
And the profit of others here.
And, if I am correct, he can get away with it.
Because legally, he was not an insider.
BCSC saw millions of shares, tens of millions, coming from one soul and they thought ""why, this must be an insider with so many shares!""
So they halted, investigated and found, no, not an insider under the law.
Let the halt expire.
I would love to know how much he made.
And if after the dump he was a short who benefits in the decline
maybe even covering right now because he knows for certain, better than anyone in the World, that there will be no more pumps.