Monday, January 31, 2011 11:20:06 AM
Is it the case that m-copaxone could be approved by the FDA, yet MNTA would not be able to sell it (market it?), unless a) the court rules in their favor in the current patent lawsuit, or b) they decide to do an "at-risk" launch?
Yes. Either way, MNTA share price would rise, but the lawsuit could be yet another overhang, fetter, to getting full value for the achievement until it is resolved.
My opinion, TEVA is vulnerable in the patent lawsuit. MNTA's attorneys need to get the ball rolling and get the trial going. All TEVA wants to do is run out the clock on that lawsuit. On the other hand, on the MNTA lovenox suit against TEVA, TEVA has some legal issues that may frustratingly be effective. Which is irrelevant, anyways, if TEVA cannot get FDA approval. Then again, like TEVA wants to run out the clock as its purpose in its lawsuit, MNTA wants to garner and make public what it considers to possibly be the sham of its lovenox application. Litigation is not just about winning or losing. And in these two cases, the plaintiffs have uphill battles if they were just fighting it on those terms.
Tinker
Advances in Domestic Heavy Rare Earth Minerals Production Essential for North American Defense Stockpiles • ALOY • Mar 18, 2026 9:00 AM
ECGI Advances $10M Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as SEC Interpretation Adds Clarity • ECGI • Mar 18, 2026 8:45 AM
ECGI Advances Mortgage Tokenization Pilot as Institutional Market Rails Continue to Develop • ECGI • Mar 17, 2026 8:30 AM
Record Gold Prices Reshape Economics of New Mine Development • SNWGF • Mar 16, 2026 10:46 AM
Cannabix Technologies Announces Commercial Launch of Marijuana Breath Test (MBT) • BLOZF • Mar 16, 2026 8:37 AM
Exxe Group Advances Platform Strategy and Share Structure Reduction Following Strategic Meetings • AXXA • Mar 11, 2026 1:03 PM
