InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/18/2003

Re: mas post# 16699

Sunday, 04/03/2005 1:56:26 AM

Sunday, April 03, 2005 1:56:26 AM

Post# of 151689
Mas,

None of us know the details, so we can only speculate. However, I can think of one scenario that probably occurs and also proves that the customers are the one who lose out. Here is my scenario.

Intel has agreements that pay for portions of an OEM’s advertising expense in which Intel products are sold. The OEM decides to include in the advertisement systems that include AMD products. Intel tells the OEM that it will not subsidize the advertisement as long as there are competitors products. AMD cries foul and gives this as a prime example of Intel “forcing” OEM’s not to sell AMD products. Personally, I think Intel is correct here, but that is my opinion. If the OEM wants to showcase AMD products they should do so separately and should not expect Intel to subsidize them. The OEM wants both and so Intel is forced not to give the OEM discounts. This is great for AMD since Intel’s products are now more expensive vis a vis AMD’s. But the end users, who buy from the OEM’s and who were given the Intel discount, will no longer be getting it. So under these circumstances the CUSTEMER is being screwed. Intel is right.

IMHO

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News