InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 91
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2010

Re: gump90 post# 127873

Friday, 01/28/2011 1:38:35 AM

Friday, January 28, 2011 1:38:35 AM

Post# of 233427
Gump
I don't think some Board members understand just what WAS P R ed about Rusty Hole # 2. The Company SAID they have assayed most of the good-looking sections all the way down the hole already. But they only asked for Lanthanum and Cerium ( I believe it was ) to be used as pathfinders for additional REE s. Now they are taking the best results of these plus some additional sections to be assayed for a more extensive suite of REE s. These are the results they are waiting on now. It is my interpretation that they have already assayed the best looking sections of Hole 2 ( a long time ago ) but only for Lanthanum and Cerium. So we shall see who is correct. Under this scenario I'm not expecting much of an improvement beyond a Ho-Hum !!!

Gump, if after receiving those initial ICP result, and with those results showing that we have high concentrations of interelement interference within those selected sections. Then its only appropriate that they should send those section out so that it can be tested for REE’s that would be affected by these interelement interference to obtain a more precise analysis of the levels of concentration for all possible REE’s. No!


ICP-AES: Our analysts review all of the data generated and will take particular note of samples with high concentrations of elements such as Fe and Al, which give significant interelement interferences. Similarly, they closely watch the concentrations of those elements such as thallium, tungsten and uranium, which are most affected by interelement interferences. Concentrations of elements in these situations are verified by examining the spectra in detail and by alternative methods such as AA when possible.

Vic