OPEN DISCUSSION BOARD

[JLS]

Pokersam,

I'm thinking about it ...
............
.......

OK, but let's do it the music jam-session way, so that there's active participation and the resultant algorithm comes out better than it's ever been, in both form and function. [My back-testing of that system was done with paper, pencil, and calculator. And I never thought it was so complex that I needed to sic a computer on it.] As we go along, I'll put it in computer form. One of the reasons for this is that I want to spend most of my time on my integrated NRn/Swap system, as I am really pumped (obsessed) on that and can't get my mind off of it. The 3/8/20 system is also integrated in that system but I don't spend much time on it.

And there's going to be goals to meet along the way related to preciseness of description in back-testable form, ease of application, and simplicity of explanation.

So the process starts this way:

first, you glean through the things I've already written about it; organize that in indented outline form; and post it here;

then, after you've posted what you have, we'll continue with correcting, adding, and putting in algorithmic form suitable for back-testing.

If you balk at doing any of those things then we'll quit where we are and I'll ask if someone else wants to take over where you left off.

One reason I want to put it in computer form that everybody can use is because then no one has a right to criticize it without offering an algorithmic improvement. In other words, they should either help or shut up and go back and sit on mommy's lap.

Do I sound like a drill sergeant (ggg)?? I really like that ad on TV where R. Lee Ermey is a psychiatrist and throws the tissue box at his patient and calls him a crybaby.