…the ruling in the case could shape the use of the "poison pill" defense against hostile takeovers.
"If (the judge) allows the pill to remain, it's a big case. If he removes it, it's a big case, too" said Charles Elson [LOL], a professor at the University of Delaware. "It defines the legality of a pill."
Under Delaware law, which governs the majority of major U.S. companies, poison pills are meant to give directors time to evaluate a deal and make their case for alternatives. They have been criticized as a way for boards to entrench themselves by defeating a hostile bid that might provide a handsome return to shareholders.
The judge overseeing the case, William Chandler, is expected to rule quickly, possibly on Thursday when the hearings are scheduled to wrap up.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”