i think the point is not the response to the suit, which i found quite boilerplate by the way, but the response to the motion for expedited discovery. that is still pending as far as i know. i'm quite certain the crux of mnta's argument centers around the fact teva approval is imminent based on teva's comments from various cnfernece calls - which are specifically cited in the original complaint. an argument teva can now counter with against expedited discovery is that they are still several months away from approval i'm not the lawyer so i don't even have a general sense of the time frame for discovery in such actions, so maybe you can enlighten me