I seem to recall posts about TEVA having "labeling discussions" with the FDA which implied potential approval of a non-substitutable generic. See the thread from Nov 2009 starting at #msg-43206942.Is that still in play here? Is that a way for the FDA to split the difference in this situation? That’s still a possible outcome, I suppose, but I do not see a new signal that a non-substitutable product is what the FDA has in mind.