News Focus
News Focus
Followers 25
Posts 2867
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/03/2009

Re: imjtw2u post# 13961

Tuesday, 01/04/2011 2:00:49 PM

Tuesday, January 04, 2011 2:00:49 PM

Post# of 19712
first of all, it's not "the other ipwg" --- it's a british company --- international power plc.
second, if you check their website, you'll see they have 4AT LEAST 4 energy plants in the tihama region of saudi arabia. jizan is also in the tihama region of saudi arabia.

i have no idea whether it is a wte facility --- just electrical - with salination. don't really care.

any intelligent person should/WOULD realize ipwg does not own a fully operational wte plant anywhere (yet).

maybe the author of the article confused not only ipplc with ipwg --- but also the energy plants owned by ipplc with a planned, but never constructed wte plant ipwg proposed back in 2006. AGAIN DON'T CARE !!!

MY POINT IS, TOO MANY PEOPLE RAN TO ACCUSE IPWG OF ILLEGAL/UNETHICAL CONDUCT --- WITHOUT EVEN THINNKING TWICE. AND OTHERS FALSELY CLAIMED IPWG OWNED A FULLY OPERATIONAL WTE PLANT IN SAUDI ARABIA --- AND YET CAN'T PAY THEIR BILLS. AND SHAME ON THEM !!!!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y