InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 434
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: Renee post# 88206

Tuesday, 01/04/2011 7:36:18 AM

Tuesday, January 04, 2011 7:36:18 AM

Post# of 103340
wrong *renee*

one has to first understand what has passed
for normal on the OTC for a few years now

that is an *entity* or two illegally manipulate
the stock .. or as it's called .. the stock becomes
an ATM .. where the stock is manipulated (remember
all those *curious* trades *renee* .. done the summer
of 2009 in between the 2 well orchestrated runs one
of which came pre CC and the other pre ETC launch)
first on the RUNS .. then on the requisite SHORT back down
this is usually repeated a few times .. and *most* co.s
wind up issuing shares (capital) and then doing multiple
r/s .. hence the rinse/repeat aspect of the ATM b4 the
final collapse

jd's tipping his hand at the CC .. was to let X *entity/s*
know that co. would actually be surviving .. which matters

the usual has been to illegally manipulate the stock
to such a degree that the co. can't survive and in time
collapses due to their stock essentially becoming worthless

the difference here .. is the co. is more than the stock
and ETC was the clue :)

after all the value with the OS fully maxed to NV's AS
(now 3.1B) would be 310,000 bucks .. and since those shares
hadn't even been issued as of yesterday .. it's actually
277,902,4576 (to be precise) .. that would be .. er .. market
cap .. too bad the co.s inventory and equipment is worth 1M
(give or take)

the irony to me is discovering *EXACTLY* which *entity* was
part of this ATM the summer of 2009 .. that has been revealing
in its own right

i look forward to mgmt's road to transparency .. not because
i need proof (tho' that will be nice) but because i look forward
to some of the actions i expect will follow that *transparency*

including legal aspects first discussed by current mgmt in 2009

nice to know aspects are changing .. *renee*

==
4kids
all jmo


but if the *expectation* is that jd or any other co. insider
sold one share (AT ALL) they'd be wrong ..

10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --