Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[never-again]

Fish, you are saying that they will just let the porv6 die by not exercising the 1-31-11 extension clause to facilitate a complete redo.

In doing so, won't Brian Rodent loose the exclusivity on PORs. If so that will open lots of doors that IMO br wants to keep closed ( remain status quo)

On the other hand, If They extend and use those 30 some odd days to correct and satisfy all of the judges "where as" remarks . They could emerge with a completely acceptable plan por v6.x with Rodent still in exclusive position. I can't see any competing por containing any releases for any party not contributing to a settlement.

I must have missed the post that contains the logic flow chart of your theory .

Seems to me br would want to keep " the status quo" of him being lead council OF DIP with out having competing PORs or risking a trustee. Maybe br is hoping on a corruptable trustee.

Hope you had a great and Merry Christmas too and those pancakes were just a starting point.