News Focus
News Focus
Followers 20
Posts 3041
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/05/2009

Re: elcheepo post# 117911

Friday, 12/24/2010 6:39:32 AM

Friday, December 24, 2010 6:39:32 AM

Post# of 233825
Thanks for posting this publically, elcheepo.
I remeber to have read that geo_newfie agreed on some points but on others he disagreed.
I'm interested in geo_newfie's interpretation on this. So geo_newfie, please give us your take :)

You say:

They are already recieving interest on the REE's they have divulged, and I guess that is why they thought they better buy up all the land around.



Is this what Ken told you to be the reason of the staking?

What I do not get, is that he only wanted to update shareholders on hole #2 upper part, of which they got assay results.
If they had sticked to that and said something like:
"Upper part results of Hole #2 we found <insert REE levels>, we're waiting for the other 90% core results"
then we would have seen a totally different trading day and he wouldn't have lied.

Also, why state the complete hole #1 contains sub-economic copper if you have no data on it.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y