News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 91
Posts 20561
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: HattieTheWitch post# 111370

Thursday, 12/23/2010 12:16:41 PM

Thursday, December 23, 2010 12:16:41 PM

Post# of 257253
Re:


Do you feel that this modification was made for any other purpose tha to increase MIT's "cut" of MNTA's share of m-Lovenox's profits?



It would make no sense to just give MIT either more or less.

I would assume that the new deal slightly "de-risks" the MNTA side. So MIT will come out better IF mL stays sole generic, but MNTA saves money if tL gets approved.

Of course, w/o the numbers we are guessing.

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now