Thunderbell, thanks for this
QUOTE
__________________________________________________________________
My bet is that everything the ESHC says publicly has to be vetted by legal. Any "hard" statement they may like to make is probably turned into "mush" by the legal team. It's all about protecting rights and positions within the context of the court proceedings.
Some of those rights being protected are yours (if you are a shareholder).
I appreciate the attorneys doing their job with expertise and constant vigilance. I am even a little surprised we got any update at all. I think most attorneys would advise against it so I bet the ESHC members pushed hard to get permission to give us what they did.
___________________________________________________________________
Thanks to Dr Bob, BubbaKC, TheGoodDoctor, TmanB, CopperKen, Paidmyway and others for your support, like I said last time, putting ANYTHING out at all is very difficult.
Superfly, looks like you read between the lines pretty good.
Panson, wish I could answer your questions, but that is the very stuff we cant discuss.
Webtime, it looked different when we first wrote it, see the quote above.