Absolutely.. Not one ounce of data to discredit Bauman, Althun, Gulco, Wolin, Pummill, lownenthal, ets or any of the new players.. All they have is "its a scam, never going to happen.." "SEC doucuments are scams, yadda yadda."
Agreed. The reason, I believe, that FFGO is at a no bid and has detractors creep in is credibility of the company prior to their involvement. I bought several million shares at .0002 and .0003 because I thought the newswires saying that there would be a dividend at the end of 2009 were true. I carried some faith on newswires. Others did too and the price and volume were "huge." After 2010 dragged on the price has stayed at .0001 and the volume dismal by comparison.
It is sort of a guilty by association that some might try to discredit these folks. They should not be discredited because the creditibility of FFGO's newswires, but I think that these and other reasons make people question NMGL. NMGL doesn't do "newswires" so I guess they can't be "discredited" this way, but being ignored as shareholders (as future A&B shareholders) should be something though. If they do not deliver on the A&B on January 1st, that would be a data point against them. I think FFGO released newswires with NMGL's blessing regarding a marketable A&B share on January 1.
This will be NMGL 1st test of credibility. Let's see if they pass.
As far as SEC documents, my experience is that you don't lie to the government. Maybe Hunter and any others should lie on their tax returns or other important documents and see how far that gets them. I don't think any rationale person would make up false or scam SEC documents, especially when there is nothing in it for them. I don't see a profitable reason to file false SEC documents.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
