Dime Bancorp Inc (fka DIMEQ)

[MrchntDeth]

Forget hardball tactics - this is flat out UNETHICAL, and borders on CRIMINAL.

They know full well that there is NO lawful basis for stealing money that is to be held IN TRUST for the benefit of the dimeq holders. End of sentence, end of story.

They are AGENTS for the DIMEQ holders, and have a fuduciary duty to act in the best interests of these holders. They are being paid 15% of net to a act in an ethical manner and to comply with the law. As if a fiduciary needed to be told this.

Rosen/Weil know this yet choose to argue out of both sides off their mouth as well as out of their @$$.

"Please completely disregard our prior motion asking the Court to be complicit in our criminal activity in stealing this money; now that the other side so BUSTED us, and caught us in yet another one of our lies, we think that the NEW and improved motion (arguing the complete opposite of what we first argued), says EXACTLY what we needed to say to steal this money."

Please go along with this crime, your honor. Everything else is correct (unless we get caught again), in which case, we'd like to use our opponents arguments to contradict them.

We are neither for it nor against it, and very much to the contrary.