**Walrath to hear shareholders after closing arguments.
I have to ask 'why'? Is it to support a rejection decision? Because otherwise, that's like kicking sand in their face while their down. Letting them speak, and then approving the POR right afterwards would be a pretty damn vicious move.
I wasn't going to comment on the hearings today, but now this has peaked my interest. Why allow shareholders to speak after closing arguments? If you were going to approve the plan, let them go first, get them out of the way and then onto closing arguments. No one will remember them by the end of the day.
But to allow them the final word (of course Rosen will probably get that) and then to approve the POR would be pretty nasty and malicious.
Can't get that out of my head. Thoughts?