News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257266
Next 10
Followers 10
Posts 903
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/19/2005

Re: HattieTheWitch post# 109962

Saturday, 12/04/2010 11:12:01 AM

Saturday, December 04, 2010 11:12:01 AM

Post# of 257266
It is not true:

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/appxl_35_U_S_C_271.htm

>>(g) Whoever without authority imports into the United States or offers to sell, sells, or uses within the United States a product which is made by a process patented in the United States shall be liable as an infringer, if the importation, offer to sell, sale, or use of the product occurs during the term of such process patent. In an action for infringement of a process patent, no remedy may be granted for infringement on account of the noncommercial use or retail sale of a product unless there is no adequate remedy under this title for infringement on account of the importation or other use, offer to sell, or sale of that product. A product which is made by a patented process will, for purposes of this title, not be considered to be so made after -

(1) it is materially changed by subsequent processes; or

(2) it becomes a trivial and nonessential component of another product.<<

In the case of T-enox, if Teva has used a patented Momenta process to produce it, it will infringe as soon as it enters the US.

Regards, Rockrat

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today