Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,624.70
(
-1.36%
)
US TECH 100
23,768.00
(
-1.51%
)
Dow Jones
46,225.15
(
-1.63%
)
Brent Oil
107.63
(
6.93%
)
Bitcoin
70,807.26
(
-4.24%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

DewDiligence

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

DewDiligence

Member Level

Re: akasidney86 post# 109740

Thursday, 12/02/2010 1:30:13 PM

Thursday, December 02, 2010 1:30:13 PM

Post# of 257253

…in the event of b), would MNTA go to a royalty position even though there is in fact no third product actually on the market due to pending legal action?

No—MNTA’s profit-share arrangement does not change to a royalty unless a competing generic Lovenox has actual commercial sales.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now