News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257470
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: DewDiligence post# 109547

Saturday, 11/27/2010 1:20:50 AM

Saturday, November 27, 2010 1:20:50 AM

Post# of 257470

Insofar as metastatic prostate cancer is terminal and a large proportion of the deaths come from skeletal events and their complications (such as VTE), the boundary between treating the cancer and treating/preventing the bone mets is not well defined, IMO.

It clearly doesn't sound like the boundary is well-defined. One of the callers tried to bridge the gap by asking the doctor if any of the previously approved disease modifying drugs for HRPC showed a correlation between an improvement in bone scans and survival. There was a bit of a pause but I believe the doctor indicated that the disease-modifying drugs have never shown improvements in bone scans.

The best I can gather from listening to the calls is that the company and investigator are indicating that a HRPC patient will most of the time die due to bone metastases. But, in the absence of bone metastases (presumably due to a bone-targeted drug like denosumab), the HRPC patient will still die from the soft tissue cancer. And EXEL is hoping that 184 will be effective in both instances.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today