How you interpret things is amazing. The Foster-Humphries suit never stated anything about "the games being played by Robinson, Foster and Humphries". So apparently that is merely your speculation about the case.
By the way, previously, didn't you say that Robinson used Coats to oust Humphries? So which is it, Coats or Foster that he (Robinson) used to oust Humphries? The problem with your speculation is that it changes like the ups and downs in the stock market. Never can tell which direction it is going to go from one moment to the next.