AI
Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:57:26 PM
lol let's handle them 1 at a time:
1. $500/ton: can be found for that price as well as ranges lower-- not my gig to hash that pricing dynamic out. Point of pay -vs- free is fair as is the point of "waste" -vs- "scrap" with "waste" tending more to the "free" side and "scrap" tending more towards the "pay" side.
2. Gaylord boxes: you said "Because it was falsely claimed after the P2O video from JBII that anything packed in a Gaylord box must be brand new plastic from Gaylord's." This is absolutely 100% false and provable via previous postings.
3. Form 15 (part 1): In the 1st post I was correcting someone else's false post that most all the OTCQX "Premier" companies SEC filed. I looked at 100% of the US Companies on OTCQX "Premier" -- you remember -- the "highest" tier touted as better than the OTCBB that JBI was supposed to trade on?
4. Form 15 (part 2): In the 2nd post I was stating "as fact" that JBI would have the opportunity to file SEC dark but that I did not think that decision point was until end of 3Q-- had they filed a Form 15 then, I would have been concerned given there was no need from an economic standpoint. So kudos to them back then and now kudos to them again for filing the next 10Q.
I never insisted JBI was filing a Form 15. Kind of reminds me of Gaylording a box for a Company or Slurry-kludging 2 companies to claim a shutdown of operations for a competitor (who by the way, may have one of their processors placed within 400 miles of JBI)
1. $500/ton: can be found for that price as well as ranges lower-- not my gig to hash that pricing dynamic out. Point of pay -vs- free is fair as is the point of "waste" -vs- "scrap" with "waste" tending more to the "free" side and "scrap" tending more towards the "pay" side.
2. Gaylord boxes: you said "Because it was falsely claimed after the P2O video from JBII that anything packed in a Gaylord box must be brand new plastic from Gaylord's." This is absolutely 100% false and provable via previous postings.
3. Form 15 (part 1): In the 1st post I was correcting someone else's false post that most all the OTCQX "Premier" companies SEC filed. I looked at 100% of the US Companies on OTCQX "Premier" -- you remember -- the "highest" tier touted as better than the OTCBB that JBI was supposed to trade on?
4. Form 15 (part 2): In the 2nd post I was stating "as fact" that JBI would have the opportunity to file SEC dark but that I did not think that decision point was until end of 3Q-- had they filed a Form 15 then, I would have been concerned given there was no need from an economic standpoint. So kudos to them back then and now kudos to them again for filing the next 10Q.
I never insisted JBI was filing a Form 15. Kind of reminds me of Gaylording a box for a Company or Slurry-kludging 2 companies to claim a shutdown of operations for a competitor (who by the way, may have one of their processors placed within 400 miles of JBI)
