News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257273
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122807
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: esimae post# 108935

Monday, 11/15/2010 2:57:19 AM

Monday, November 15, 2010 2:57:19 AM

Post# of 257273
Re: Tacit agreement with SNY on Lovenox pricing

[Rick Shea] also said they are not interested in going much higher and triggering an AG.

As previously noted (e.g. in #msg-55779320), these comments are directed squarely at SNY. It would be illegal for MNTA to fix Lovenox pricing with SNY, and an agreement about a possible AG launch by SNY is tantamount to an agreement on pricing; however, it’s legal for MNTA to throw out hints intended for SNY’s consumption on a conference call for MNTA investors, and that’s exactly what MNTA has been doing.

Bottom line: NVS/MNTA has a tacit agreement with SNY to split the US Lovenox market 50/50. Thus, NVS/MNTA will not attempt to raise their market share significantly higher than 50% even though they could easily do so if they wanted to.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today