For those interested, I've just added some messages to the Zeev's Ideas Board (#board-1351).
I urge those prone to question the "accuracy" of Zeev's "calls" to consider his responses in messages 41080 and 41232 in the ZEEV, DYNAMICS post. Most of the ankle-biting I've seen seems to come from those who don't grasp the (seemingly elementary and obvious) points he makes in these posts.
I posted two ZEEV, TECHNICALS because one of them contains a long link. I posted it separately (in #78) so the window width would not make the text in the other messages difficult to read.