You list my quote and lo and behold, it has an "imo" in it. So from the very start I state that it is in my opinion from GOIG or a GOIG related party. Your subsequent posts were more assertative and your implication was clear: As to the person being a shareholder, well, aren't most executives/employess/contractors of GOIG "shareholders" ? You've got nothing to back that up with and you are wrong about him not posting his name.