InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252816
Next 10
Followers 13
Posts 325
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2008

Re: DragonBits post# 108534

Tuesday, 11/09/2010 1:09:24 PM

Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:09:24 PM

Post# of 252816
<<<What is their reasoning for misrepresenting the status of Lovenox?>>>

To keep their share price up. If Teva can get generic lovenox approved, then there really is nothing special about what MNTA did, now is there? If Teva cannot get generic lovenox approved, then dang, perhaps MNTA really does have superlative and unique technology that can just as easily take apart copaxone (counter to Teva's fervant hollering to the contrary).

The longer they can keep the share price up from copaxone FUD, the better it is for Teva. Generic lovenox itself is material, but nothing stupendous to Teva in the long-run, but MNTA's abilityt to recreate copaxone is earth shaking to Teva. The longer they can maintain the fiction that MNTA has done nothing special, the better it is for the share price for investor's being told left and right by analysts and Teva that the copaxone threat is no biggy.

Thats my initial thought on it.

Tinker
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.