InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252980
Next 10
Followers 69
Posts 6152
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/26/2008

Re: DewDiligence post# 108448

Monday, 11/08/2010 8:11:37 PM

Monday, November 08, 2010 8:11:37 PM

Post# of 252980

It’s reasonable to not want to gamble on the timing—or the ultimate resolution—of an FDA clinical hold. (Just ask anyone who was burned by the FDA hold on CORX.)

No need to. I was one of those people, unfortunately. And that experience probably played a part in why I sold IDIX. Although it seems reasonable to think that the hold on 184, at least, will be lifted, there are no guarantees as I witnessed first-hand with CORX.

Moreover, the FDA hold could cause IDIX to fall to behind INHX and end up in third place in this race.

Now, let's not get too carried away. ; )

Another point that you may have overlooked: GSK has evidently dropped its plans to run a phase-2 combination trial of its ‘572 HIV integrase inhibitor with IDX899. Although GSK still appears to be committed to IDX899 development, it looks like GSK has put ‘572 on the express track and IDX899 on the local.

Thanks, I was not aware of that. That's yet another semi-concern for me.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.