News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257295
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122815
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: biomaven0 post# 92399

Monday, 11/01/2010 6:44:29 AM

Monday, November 01, 2010 6:44:29 AM

Post# of 257295
FDA demands new phase-3 trials for BIOD’s Linjeta:

Key question here is if they can get the FDA to ignore some of the data from one of their India-based trials. If you throw out that data, then their trial succeeded, if not, it failed to show non-inferiority.

The FDA did not accept the post-hoc exclusion of data from India, but this was far from the only problem:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/FDA-Issues-Complete-Response-prnews-1215523873.html?x=0&.v=1

With regard to efficacy, the FDA stated that, in the type 1 trial analysis, excluding data from India was post-hoc and therefore not sufficient for establishing conclusive evidence of efficacy. In the type 2 trial analysis, the FDA acknowledged that non-inferiority was established in the completer population but stated that non-inferiority was not established in the intent-to-treat population because the agency did not consider a post-hoc modification of the statistical model as establishing conclusive evidence of efficacy.

With regard to safety, the FDA commented that unequivocal non-inferiority needs to be achieved in order to compare the risk of hypoglycemia. The FDA requested that the company conduct two new phase 3 clinical trials using the commercial formulation, one in patients with type 1 diabetes and the other in patients with type 2 diabetes, to establish efficacy and safety as related to hypoglycemia and toleration.

CC at 8:30am ET. Ouch for BIOD longs.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today