News Focus
News Focus
Followers 10
Posts 734
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2009

Re: Dumerthanmost post# 2446

Wednesday, 10/27/2010 1:42:12 PM

Wednesday, October 27, 2010 1:42:12 PM

Post# of 8307
As I recall, the issue of damages has been briefed. If someone has access to Pacer, that's easy enough to determine.

Actual payout is not contingent on receipt of payment from govt. Because the warrant agreement has been breached, the court can now determine that a breach exists and compute damages. Only issue is how it determines the value of the non-final damages.

Attorneys fees were estimated at something like 20M in the original. I think that's generous, but if you plug that in you're on your way.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today