News Focus
News Focus
Followers 22
Posts 1942
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/19/2009

Re: Regulator78 post# 68096

Thursday, 10/21/2010 11:29:49 AM

Thursday, October 21, 2010 11:29:49 AM

Post# of 83058
Reg,

Please read the post again, I am not saying anything about being not being upfront and honest, however today it is a whole different ballgame,we have all new players for the most part and what may or may not have transpired a year or 2 years ago has absolutely no bearing on what is in process at this time......we can not keep hammering on what might have been or what may have happened....today we are in CH11 and we have an EC appointed by the courts.....the only thing we, as shareholders can do at this point is place our trust in the appointees on that committee, they are our sole representation in all respect and in all decisions presented to the courts.....we can not question the present IR or management and under no circumstance can we try to question members of the EC.....now if you have a valid case that you feel the previous company does owe you money, you must file through the courts,the same way all other creditors do.....I,along with many others that I know are very well aware that in most cases of CH11's the shareholders end up with nothing,simply because they are the last to be paid out....however that is not always the case and it is not the only way to profit from CH11's.....I am just saying it is extremely premature to talk CH7 at this time or at all, we are CH11 because there is a very good chance of CPRKQ being reorganized into a profitable company,if the courts didn't see that we would have already been CH7....but right now it is CPRKQ and no longer CPRK....so your complaints about the old company will fall on mostly deaf ears....as I see it...

Paid

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today