News Focus
News Focus
Followers 76
Posts 17375
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/04/2007

Re: balance_builder post# 225421

Wednesday, 10/13/2010 9:11:59 AM

Wednesday, October 13, 2010 9:11:59 AM

Post# of 367111
I think that DK is correct when saying that the funds raised are for acquisitions, at least as the primary reason.

I also think that the wording in the SEC filings are done in a way so that should any acquisition fall through for whatever reason, ERHC is covered in terms of using the funds for other purposes.

Balance, I think you need to face the fact that ERHC's intention really is to do an acquisition, and by acquisition they mean a percentage in a revenue producing property.

Second, if they really are serious about the AIM, and there is no reason to believe otherwise, then they must either do a buy out before then, which is unlikely, or no buy out at all.

Balance, it is my belief that with all the dots, the dots don't add up to a buy out. I think that is becoming the consensus view on this board as well.

Krombacher
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y