Industrial Nanotech Inc (INTK)

[boogaloo]

K, I'd guess everyone here has likely already voted, so now you're preaching to the choir. Too bad so many investors got burned so much on this stock (horrible multi-year chart / performance) - they might be more proactive if not.

It really shouldn't be about voting - the company has had long enough already to do the sought-after tests and to prove via hardcore data what they are claiming. Instead, they have a collage of data from various sources... some of which appears obscure & it's more than obvious to anyone with intelligence that that type of source will be scoffed at because it's not seen as official or widely recognized as credible.

There's a difference between ignoring those who are stubbornly naysaying & negative to everything that's new/novel, and simply turning one's cheek to the needs for data from widely recognized credible sources & legitimizing actions that are needed to PERSUADE industries to use a new product. IMO, the company seems to do a fair amount of the latter. The CEO can barely be heard from it would seem, and misses many of the presentations & conferences that were announced in the past... as far as I can tell. Shouldn't a novel tiny company CEO be out front aggressively espousing the wonders of his product to anyone who will listen? Press releases aren't good enough. I'm talking real data from credible sources... being gently crammed down the throats of everyone at conferences, etc.

You could probably get some convincing test ideas from that consulting firm I posted here today. They have PhD level Engineers & scientists on staff as consultants. I believe someone like that can design a bullet-proof test that can't be argued with!