News Focus
News Focus
Followers 64
Posts 6448
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 02/09/2007

Re: uncleremus post# 98234

Sunday, 09/26/2010 2:06:47 PM

Sunday, September 26, 2010 2:06:47 PM

Post# of 107353
There is way too much stale info floating around IMO

Even the S&P "factual report" on DPDW is full of errors even though it is "updated" frequently.

I don't have the latest share count handy but I did check about a week ago. I'll post the numbers if I can later.

The book says 1% of the outstanding per quarter IIRC for 144 shares. If PIPE participants can short against 144s, as the courts have ruled, why couldn't C do the same? Same thing for spouse or former partner.

Selling way below book value after a rebound like DDI has shown in the latest Q (EBITDA turned positive at least) has me going over everything again and sorting according to facts, clues, theory, hype etc

If you look back at the chart there are a few spikes like mini short squeezes, what up whit dat?

Would a R/S flush out phantom shares?

- Foglifter -

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KLNG News