News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257266
Next 10
Followers 1
Posts 1114
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2009

Re: oc631 post# 103691

Wednesday, 09/08/2010 2:54:03 AM

Wednesday, September 08, 2010 2:54:03 AM

Post# of 257266
As a layman I would argue that 2) is a better outcome that 1) since if 1) were to be true Idenix will likely have a hard time partnering with companies looking to combine treatments. If 320 was the sole culprit then obviously 184 will be in the clear and could be partnered at some point. Else companies will likely be nervous about both 184 and 320 since combo treatments are the future.

Actually the best outcome is that all 3 SAE's were caused by external factors and not by any of the 3 factors you wrote about but perhaps the likelihood of that is tiny.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today