Admittedly I am baffled which pushs the merger notion higher in my list of conjectural probabilities.
I've read the definiton as your posted it in July. Regardless of the validity of the theory or lack of same, It appears to me we could substitute "wish projections" for your application of the theory to ACLH. I'm not being facetious. How exactly DO you screen out your hopes for this stock to preclude them from coloring/tainting your surmises, which may be at total variance from what is really going on?
For example does the theory account for 'bad actors', malfeasance, poor decisions and incompetence? I'm not claiming any of thoe variables apply in this case, but I am asking if your theory allows for those 'variables'.