InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 416
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/02/2004

Re: TigerTrader83 post# 121987

Thursday, 09/02/2010 2:47:41 PM

Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:47:41 PM

Post# of 131532
Not what I am looking for. Looking for why? One thing is for sure.
If they are legally short small or huge position, they do not have to cover-they simply go through the split short as we go through long. Total shares have nothing to do w/it unless they are naked short, which I doubt. They only have to cover when expiration takes place, not because of the split. They will also have twice the amt of shares like us. The part I do agree w/is a solid PR and continued revenues to convince new buyers this is a forward looking co. I don't like the idea of going up to only .006 or whatever and then to .0003 super sub-penny. 1000's of percent to climb to just 3 cents. Don't like that at all. This is not TASR where we are in severe demand of needed shares. Don't like it at all. I'm stuck in paradise. I hate being stuck in the trade-