News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 36
Posts 2637
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/06/2003

Re: DewDiligence post# 103029

Tuesday, 08/31/2010 9:10:11 AM

Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:10:11 AM

Post# of 257262

Thus, the $40M number was presumably a lowball estimate that NVS thought was the minimum number they could use to make NVS’ counter-argument vis-à-vis irreparable harm credible to the judge.



The "$40M" came right after the shipment of 5M units into the channel. For all we know, the "$40M" was supply-constrained at the time - it may have been every unit available. Thus, a FACT was available that supported the argument that on-going sales would not cause irreparable harm.

I am surprised every time the $40M in six weeks is mentioned without the corresponding fact that 5M units were shipped on approval. Those 5M units* would sell for $266M at drugstore.com pricing.


ij

* That is for the 80mg dose which is the dose for the average weight adult (162F, 190M) 176lb at 1mg/kg. The $266M is a retail price so it must be reduced by the markup.

http://www.drugstore.com/pharmacy/prices/drugprice.asp?ndc=00781311968&trx=1Z5006

There are times when rules and precedents cannot be broken; others when they cannot be adhered to with safety. (Thomas Joplin)

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today