News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257268
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: jbog post# 102987

Monday, 08/30/2010 10:15:19 PM

Monday, August 30, 2010 10:15:19 PM

Post# of 257268

I guess where I'm confused is in your cash flow/ profit model as explained in msg# 101267, you are suggesting that Momenta is responsible for 100% of Sandoz's total development costs. I could understand if Momenta was responsible for 45% (profit percentage) of the costs, but it makes no sense for them to be responsible for 100% of them.

NVS gets to recoup 100% of its development costs from Lovenox net profits. That’s where the 100% figure you’re talking about comes from.

If MNTA’s share of Lovenox net profits during the period when NVS is recouping its development costs is 45%, then MNTA effectively foregoes cash flow equal to 45% of NVS’ development costs in order to allow NVS to recoup its development costs from Lovenox net profits. That’s where the 45% figure you’re talking about comes from.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today