News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 4568
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2009

Re: Scandle34 post# 67974

Friday, 08/27/2010 10:32:14 PM

Friday, August 27, 2010 10:32:14 PM

Post# of 312101
I have no need to comment further onn Agilyx's patent if we operate under atmospheric pressure - with or without an inert nitrogen purge. Taking away a claimed element of a system or method patent does not infringe. Adding an element (eg the catalyst) but still using all of the claimed elements does.


I agree. If JBII's process works as they claim then they have effectively improved upon Agilyx's patent. All the more reason for JBII to protect that IP as soon as possible - after all, Agilyx would be interested in that technology and it wouldn't take much for them to reverse-engineer this:

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y