InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 162
Posts 5310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2009

Re: MONICALAW post# 233044

Thursday, 08/26/2010 6:47:03 PM

Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:47:03 PM

Post# of 730593
Monicalaw, uh.. you mean the contract... the P&A contract?

That's here: http://www.fdic.gov/about/freedom/Washington_Mutual_P_and_A.pdf

But, a little correction. The extension you reference isn't for the P&A to be "valid". The P&A is valid.

As per the extension, and for the reporting done, it's for valuation of different elements of the P&A. It's been compared to your credit card agreement -- a legal contract -- allowing for _certain_ unilateral changes by your credit card company.

The P&A stands. Same thing. JPM and FDIC have a valid contract. However, the FDIC has certain unilateral changes that can be made, until they don't extend things.

This is why I fully expect the FDIC to extend the P&A -- makes no sense for them not to continue holding things over JPM's head.

But the contract itself is binding.

Your assumptions (#2 and #3 -- I didn't see a #1) are incorrect.

...Catz




.... Please, just call me Catz ;) - - - - - {and the requisite, all IMHO, do your own due diligence, and make your own investments}

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News