News Focus
News Focus
Followers 161
Posts 5310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2009

Re: umaw post# 233004

Thursday, 08/26/2010 5:19:00 PM

Thursday, August 26, 2010 5:19:00 PM

Post# of 749756
umaw - she was asked by the Debtors (WMI) _NOT_ to rule, because a GSA was (and did) get signed which resolved the $4b.

Since the Debtors brought the $4b motion, it is also the Debtors that can ask her to not rule.

She tipped her hand a few (maybe more) hearings ago when she was ready to rule on the Summary Judgement. I really don't know why she hasn't to date



Sucks. But all the hatred against the judge for not ruling on the $4b is misplaced.

The Debtors get to say "rule" or "not rule" and they chose the latter.

Get upset with Weil/Rosen.

Or, wait for the EC or someone else to file their OWN motion for the $4b... which hasn't happened yet. And with the EC, there must be strategy there that I don't understand.

...Catz


.... Please, just call me Catz ;) - - - - - {and the requisite, all IMHO, do your own due diligence, and make your own investments}

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today