InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253124
Next 10
Followers 12
Posts 2277
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/05/2005

Re: jmkobers post# 101638

Saturday, 08/14/2010 6:33:34 PM

Saturday, August 14, 2010 6:33:34 PM

Post# of 253124
MNTA:
"Don't confuse one man's opinion with fact. There's a big difference."
{Agreed. We simply do not know about Teva's inspections. A theorem is not quite as convincing as an axiom.}

"It's possible that someone knows the real answer, and it's not bullish for MNTA."
{Disagree. Who could possibly know? Only someone "confusing their opinions with facts." Who knew about MNTA's approval beforehand? The stock action did not suggest anyone knew; yet, you imply that Teva's postion is somehow different as far as "leaks." Bernstein comes to mind...
The only difference today, is that we know the FDA is willing to approve a generic Lovenox.}

IRT to facts vs. opinions: When you see the Sandoz/MNTA sales figures for the 3rd Quarter and are promptly astonished, note that those figures will be booked as "facts" in MNTA's 3rd QTR 10-Q as revenues.

"If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure."
-Dan Quayle

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.