News Focus
News Focus
Followers 9
Posts 643
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/28/2009

Re: None

Wednesday, 08/11/2010 9:34:51 AM

Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:34:51 AM

Post# of 67237
Interesting document from Lazard's dispute to Supobena by EC.

http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0911233/0911233100810000000000003.pdf

You can see the attorneys arguing over set items and definitions. The one issue that I have is the priviledge argument between Lazard and Rog, BOD, Ad-hoc, Creditors, etal... is who has paid the bill for those attorney fees? The stakeholdres ie stock holders. Our equity went down while we paid for private conferences? In my book, morally that is wrong.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today