Thursday, October 10, 2002 1:05:58 PM
fingolfen: Re: "When AMD moved to copper for 0.18 micron, many individuals made the case that 1) they would enjoy a massive speed advantage due to copper and 2) their move to 0.13 micron would be easier than Intel's because "they already learned the lessons of copper.""
I would argue that AMD did enjoy a significant speed advantage that coincided with the transition to copper and 0.18u. Thunderbird was beating P/// hands-down, and P4 was only beginning to ramp. It really was not until Northwood that Intel regained the undisputed speed crown. Whether or not AMD ever had a "massive" speed advantage is an argument over semantics.
"Analysis of the evolution of the AMD 0.18 micron process shows that the only reason they maintained performance parity with Intel was through shortening the channel lengths, not because of any intrinsic speed benefit from copper. Copper, it appears, is truly there primarily for electromigration issues, just like Intel said way back when."
Well, Intel was not the only one saying what the benefits of copper were. I don't think that anyone who has at least a rudimentary understanding of the physics could conclude that copper in and of itself has any intrinsic speed benefit. Copper provides reduced electromigration and lower electrical resistance. These characteristics were necessary for a shrink to be successful. The shrink allowed for better speeds, copper allowed the shrink.
As for the migration to 0.13u, AMD simply dropped the ball. It could be that they were trying to do too much at one Fab, it could be poor management, it could be poor engineering, it could be a myriad other things. I do not know for sure what the real reasons were (are). I do know that AMD went from hero to goat in relatively short order, while Intel executed flawlessly. However, if AMD can get Hammer ironed out quickly, that could reverse just as quickly.
I agree that Intel has a strong design and development group. But, they have not been without their own gaffes. Like AMD, Intel has a long list of "oops" in their history. I simply maintain that strained silicon is a very new medium, and there is at least the potential for it to be a roadblock for Intel.
I would argue that AMD did enjoy a significant speed advantage that coincided with the transition to copper and 0.18u. Thunderbird was beating P/// hands-down, and P4 was only beginning to ramp. It really was not until Northwood that Intel regained the undisputed speed crown. Whether or not AMD ever had a "massive" speed advantage is an argument over semantics.
"Analysis of the evolution of the AMD 0.18 micron process shows that the only reason they maintained performance parity with Intel was through shortening the channel lengths, not because of any intrinsic speed benefit from copper. Copper, it appears, is truly there primarily for electromigration issues, just like Intel said way back when."
Well, Intel was not the only one saying what the benefits of copper were. I don't think that anyone who has at least a rudimentary understanding of the physics could conclude that copper in and of itself has any intrinsic speed benefit. Copper provides reduced electromigration and lower electrical resistance. These characteristics were necessary for a shrink to be successful. The shrink allowed for better speeds, copper allowed the shrink.
As for the migration to 0.13u, AMD simply dropped the ball. It could be that they were trying to do too much at one Fab, it could be poor management, it could be poor engineering, it could be a myriad other things. I do not know for sure what the real reasons were (are). I do know that AMD went from hero to goat in relatively short order, while Intel executed flawlessly. However, if AMD can get Hammer ironed out quickly, that could reverse just as quickly.
I agree that Intel has a strong design and development group. But, they have not been without their own gaffes. Like AMD, Intel has a long list of "oops" in their history. I simply maintain that strained silicon is a very new medium, and there is at least the potential for it to be a roadblock for Intel.
Recent INTC News
- Intel and Google Deepen Collaboration to Advance AI Infrastructure with Xeon CPUs and Custom IPUs • Business Wire • 04/09/2026 01:00:00 PM
- U.S. stock futures edge lower as markets await Iran ceasefire talks in Pakistan: Dow Jones, S&P, Nasdaq, Wall Street • IH Market News • 04/09/2026 11:36:18 AM
- U.S. stock futures slip as markets await Iran ceasefire talks in Pakistan: Dow Jones, S&P, Nasdaq, Wall Street • UK Market News • 04/09/2026 11:36:10 AM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/08/2026 08:05:34 PM
- Intel shares rise after joining Terafab semiconductor initiative • IH Market News • 04/07/2026 01:50:28 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/03/2026 04:50:37 PM
- Intel Appoints Aparna Bawa as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal & People Officer • Business Wire • 04/02/2026 08:05:00 PM
- Ceasefire Hopes and Strong Economic Data Power Wall Street Rally to Start Q2 • IH Market News • 04/01/2026 08:34:46 PM
- Intel to repurchase Apollo’s stake in Irish chip facility for $14.2 billion • IH Market News • 04/01/2026 02:48:34 PM
- Intel to Repurchase 49% Equity Interest in Ireland Fab Joint Venture • Business Wire • 04/01/2026 01:00:00 PM
- Intel to Report First-Quarter 2026 Financial Results • Business Wire • 03/31/2026 09:02:00 PM
- Form SCHEDULE 13G/A - Statement of Beneficial Ownership by Certain Investors: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/27/2026 01:51:11 PM
- Intel shares rise after report of planned CPU price increases • IH Market News • 03/25/2026 03:24:25 PM
- Form DEFA14A - Additional definitive proxy soliciting materials and Rule 14(a)(12) material • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/23/2026 08:38:44 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/23/2026 08:35:22 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/04/2026 12:57:09 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/04/2026 12:56:24 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/04/2026 12:55:26 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/04/2026 12:54:23 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/04/2026 12:53:24 AM
- Intel Board Chair Frank D. Yeary to Retire Following Annual Meeting; Dr. Craig H. Barratt Elected as Chair • Business Wire • 03/03/2026 09:01:00 PM
- Intel Corporation to Participate in Upcoming Investor Conference • Business Wire • 02/18/2026 09:30:00 PM
- Nvidia, Meta Advance on Broader AI Infrastructure Alliance; AMD Slips • IH Market News • 02/18/2026 11:26:05 AM
