InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252200
Next 10
Followers 4
Posts 929
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/15/2006

Re: tinkershaw post# 101068

Sunday, 08/08/2010 12:57:41 PM

Sunday, August 08, 2010 12:57:41 PM

Post# of 252200

Teva's capacity to fully characterize.



Teva's problem is more than just the ability to fully characterize the components of Lovenox. They would also need to identically manufacture. This must also be part of MNTA's proprietary toolset: the ability to reverse engineer Lovenox.

How far ahead of their competitors is MNTA in the ability to characterize and reverse engineer? 2 years? 5 years?

Seems like they are far enough ahead that MNTA would be a good takeover target in the generic space.

Probably won't happen before the lawsuits (Lovenox and Copaxone) are settled, but it seems likely if these are settled in favor of MNTA in the next few years and MNTA is still ahead of the competition in characterization/reverse engineering.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.