News Focus
News Focus
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: bag8ger post# 85402

Saturday, 08/07/2010 6:42:36 PM

Saturday, August 07, 2010 6:42:36 PM

Post# of 118239
DNAP was obviously not a viable company. They specifically told their investors that they needed to sell stock to survive. RCCH on the other hand pretends to have a viable business with actual revenues.

The pps should have zero effect on the 'business' of RCCH. The joke is, the argument that stock manipulation has hurt the business of the company is an outright admission that the company has extracted its revenue from the pockets of its investors as opposed to operating a viable business model.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today