I don't think you do have an agenda other than to see your investment thrive. I'm not sure we have any disagreement on the potential of the technology. i believe you agreed with my post you commented on except for my Business Model suggestions. Let's start with the response from OEM engine or auto manufacturers. They will void warranty if any of their equipment is modified. Pre 1995 and carb engines are gettin rare. For test purposes readers who need to prove to themselves that this works i'd suggest a non fuel injected car where they can lean out the carb very easily. Lean it until you have gas starved the engine to the point of stallin out. Add the hho with that settin and monitor results. Test performance, fuel consumption and emissions if possible. This should be nothin new ta you or many others here. results will be positive. todays fuel inj and ECU's are a different ball game but done correctly results are even better especially with injectors that atomize properly. Injectors become an important issue and the ECU mapping problems are well known. This is why I say a ground up company product needs to be developed usin all available technology to maximise results. Accurate testing needs to be videoed and published, even if it's Youtube to start. When done like this it will bring huge media attention. a technology that is being called a scam can be proven in a scientifically accepted manner. Engine on a dyno, read out of the ECU mappin and air fuel ratios as well as fuel consumption gains and emissions reductions over the same engine runnin without hho injection. If this company can do that this pps will be a buck real fast. Hoss can have a complete product ready for additional PR and eventual revenue stream. Your thoughts?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
