News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257273
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122807
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: iwfal post# 100306

Saturday, 07/31/2010 9:41:09 AM

Saturday, July 31, 2010 9:41:09 AM

Post# of 257273
Re: SVR12 vs SVR

For regimens consisting of SoC or SoC plus a single DAA, the difference between SVR12 and SVR was widely believed to be more consequential in the second-line setting than in the first-line setting. This has been stated on numerous occasions by executives (mainly the CMO’s) at such companies as VRTX and GILD.

Then along came VRTX’s PROVE-3 study, which changed the prevailing view on this subject to some degree. In the ‘12+12’ arm of PROVE-3, only one patient out of 60 who achieved SV12 failed to achieve SVR (see note 4 in #msg-36464842).

--
p.s. The original point of this thread was not the degree to which SVR12 was predictive of SVR, but rather that ANDS chose to issue a PR to report SVR12 data on only six patients. My contention is that ANDS’ PR was a pump because ANDS could simply have waited to report the SVR data (#msg-52795076).

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today