News Focus
News Focus
Followers 89
Posts 41310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2006

Re: OldTymer post# 327730

Friday, 07/30/2010 5:18:12 PM

Friday, July 30, 2010 5:18:12 PM

Post# of 346953
OT, that's not on the SEC .. its the BK laws

puppy, once they went into chapter 11, I pretty much had already assumed the shareholders would lose everything. There just isn't enough money or assets to go around. Shareholders are always the lowest rung on the ladder, which seems contradictory, considering it's the SEC's job to protect the shareholders. If they're so interested in protecting the shareholders, you would think they would be paid first, if not in full, at least a percentage of what they lost. I know the argument that shareholders had plenty of warnings about SPNG, but that's not the point. I'm looking at it from the viewpoint of what the SEC's credo is. Oh well.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today