News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257255
Next 10
Followers 2
Posts 635
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/23/2007

Re: DewDiligence post# 99853

Tuesday, 07/27/2010 12:14:58 PM

Tuesday, July 27, 2010 12:14:58 PM

Post# of 257255
Irreparable harm is a non-starter under case law... It is highly unlikely that Sanofi will be able to meet the threshold needed to prove irreparable harm.


Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Shalala, 923 F. Supp. 212, 220-21 (D.D.C.
1996) (finding no irreparable harm where the movant would lose eighty million dollars–less than
one percent of its total sales)

Lightfoot v. District of Columbia, No. 01-1484, 2006
WL 175222, *8 (D.D.C. Jan. 24, 2006) (holding that losses must threaten the survival of a
business)

TGS Tech., Inc. v. United States, No. 92-0062, 1992 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 195, at *10 (D.D.C. Jan. 14, 1992) (finding no irreparable harm where a lost contract
constituted twenty percent of the movant’s business).

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now